Ecosystem extent in protected areas

PDF

Extent of ​​protected areas in Armenia

In accordance with Decree N 1059-Ա (25.09.2014) of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, the PAs in 2014 were as follows:
– 3 state reserves (“Khosrov Forest”, “Shikahogh” and “Erebuni”), which occupy an area of ​​35,439.6 hectares or 1.19% of the total area of ​​Armenia,
– 4 national parks (“Sevan”, “Dilijan”, “Lake Arpi” and “Arevik”), which occupy an area of ​​236,802.1 hectares or 7.96% of the total area of ​​Armenia,
– 232 natural monuments,
– 27 state sanctuaries, which occupy an area of ​​114,812.7 hectares or 3.95% of the total area of ​​Armenia.
The total area of state reserves, sanctuaries, and national parks was 387,054.4 hectares, which accounted for 13.1% of Armenia’s total territory.

Table 1. PAs areas in 2014 according to the Ministry of Environment of Armenia

PAArea, ha
STATE RESERVES
Khosrov Forest23 213.5
Shikahogh12 137.1
Erebuni89.0
NATIONAL PARKS
Sevan147 455.0
Dilijan33 765.0
Lake Arpi21 179.3
Arevik34 401.8
NATURAL SANCTUARIES
Akhnabad25.0
Arjatkhlenu40.0
Juniper sparse forest3 312.0
Gyulagarak2 576.0
Herher sparse forest6 139.0
Jermuk Forest3 865.0
Sosu Park64.2
Aragats Alpine300.0
Banks pine4.0
Goravan sand dunes95.99
Caucasian rosehip1 000.0
Arzakan-Meghradzor13 532.0
Gandzakar6 813.0
Getik5 728.0
Ijevan5 908.0
Margahovitti3 368.0
Yeghegnadzor4 200.0
Goris1850.0
Red worm219.85
Boghakar2 728.0
Black Lake240.0
Deep wound50.28
Hanqavan Hydrological5 169.04
Jermuk Hydrological17 371.0
Zangezur25 870.64
Zikatar150.0
Khustup6946.74

Ecosystem extent in PAs

At the present stage, we do not have access to official data covering all Armenian protected areas (PAs) for the period after 2014, official digitized maps of PA boundaries, or land cover data specifically refined for the territory of Armenia. Therefore, the following analyses are based on the available digital PA map referenced below and the global ESRI land cover dataset. The use of the ESRI land cover dataset for relatively small PA areas leads to significant errors in area estimation. In the examples below, we demonstrate only the type of analysis that can, in principle, be conducted for ecosystem accounting of PAs based on land cover data.
All resulting estimates are of methodological value only and should be refined using official PA boundaries and land cover data provided by the PAs.

This example of accounting for protected areas (PAs) is based on the PA map provided by Acopian Center for the Environment, American University of Armenia and the vegetation map prepared by Aleksanyan Alla (Institute of Botany after A. Takhtajyan NAS RA) and Asatryan Vardan (Scientific center of zoology and hydroecology of NAS RA), and ESRI land cover data from 2017 and 2023.

Figure 1. The map of protected areas of Armenia (for details see section Protected areas here). (The location of the Goravan Sands Sanctuary needs to be clarified)


Figure 3. The share of area of ​​land cover classes and anthropogenic areas, %.
*Arpa is protected landscape

Table 3. Area of land cover classes in PAs, ha
(* the total area of PAs shown on the map used may differ from the official data, as the PA boundaries on the map require further clarification)

PA typePATreesRangelandBare GroundSnow/IceWater and flooded vegetationCropsBuilt-up areaTotal area of PA*
State ReservesErebuni084.8400003.588.30
Khosrov Forest2404.9120231.1731.7600.515.33176.6322868.59
Shikahogh9854.311937.140000011810.26
National ParksSevan5525.114346.2313.230126863.32173.482336.68151374.99
Dilijan24757.7912862.58005.2111.411546.2639214.50
Arpi Lake186.3343922.38.6402123.8210719.45810.157828.90
Arevik4158.4837530.4436.281.253.1105.1241852.62
Protected landscapeArpa1.498148.121.010001.78158.56
State SanctuariesAkhnabat Yew Grove024.850000024.86
Aragats Alpine0276.720.174.115.6704.11301.07
Ararat Vordan Karmir00.37000166.6338.36205.60
Arzakan and Meghradzor7503.256181.23.3907.27285.16521.2614518.08
Boghaqar1112.761757.96000002872.27
Caucasian Rose-Bay1037.93794.25000015.021848.58
Gandzakar-Upper Aghdan2973.96925.740000.077.733910.26
Getik1354.881559.370.0301.6558.24148.683124.67
Gilan48.48238.60.230000287.41
Goravan Sands0106.47000106.930213.47
Goris11.93934.73000847.9696.391901.05
Hankavan Hydrological191.05783.4200001.3976.53
Hazel-Nut040.730000.580.2441.48
Herher Open Woodland7.172047.416.58035.85002098.67
Ijevan5725.752048.540005.77.297793.64
Jermuk726.013336.610000.9404066.48
Jermuk Hydrological388.692163.31000.05028.12581.86
Juniper Open Woodlands of Sevan8.93764.7921.600.260.9670.753930.40
Khor Virap0.01124.8000.2831.712.45159.37
Margahovit2285.42222.6300.14069.8523.134604.38
Pine of Banx04.62000004.61
Pine of Gyulagarak1768.24661.8100014.270.612446.95
Plane Grove1098.251049.340001.4313.582174.57
Sev Lich0150.560.47089.1400240.32
Yeghegis230.751927.080.45000.5236.322196.95
Zangezur127.0624156.19241.243.5433.92.03024711.29
Zikatar2691.57504.37000003198.61

All vegetation zones are represented in the PAs. The area of some PAs is entirely covered by vegetation of a single zone, for example: Goravan Sands – desert; Erebuni, Ararat, and Khor Virap — semi-desert;Hazel Nut – broadleaf woodlands; Gandzakar-Upper Aghdan, Goris, Hankavan Hydrological, Pine of Gyulagarak, Plane Grove – forest zone; Akhnabat Yew Grove, Pine of Banx, Sev Lich — subalpine meadows; Aragats Alpine – alpine meadows (Figure 26B-3).


Figure 2. The share of area of ​​vegetation zones in PAs, %

Table 2. Area of vegetation zones in PAs, ha
(* the total area of PAs shown on the map used may differ from the official data, as the PA boundaries on the map require further clarification)

PA typePAAlpine meadows and carpetsSubalpine meadowsMeadow-steppeForestJuniperBroadleaf woodlandSteppeSemi-desertMarshNo dataTotal area of PA*
State ReservesErebuni000000088.340088.34
Khosrov Forest0268.6408533.69014.7212399.131626.93.583.6522850.31
Shikahogh0405.25011224.9700000176.0411806.26
National ParksSevan0016.0320957.52005204.0900125080.4151258.04
Dilijan06667.1115.3730799.09001701.6800039183.25
Arpi Lake2375.2717575.6532567.5100040.3104514.36726.2357799.33
Arevik4371.36231.62023943.9205172.401651.390461.2741831.9
Protected landscapeArpa0490.08073.1417.2306997.61574.26008152.32
State SanctuariesAkhnabat Yew Grove024.850000000024.85
Aragats Alpine300.77000000000300.77
Ararat Vordan Karmir0000000205.3600205.36
Arzakan and Meghradzor1.875171.99699.078547.13000086.52014506.58
Boghaqar0.32600.7302269.670000002870.72
Caucasian Rose-Bay0235.1901051.50560.5100001847.2
Gandzakar-Upper Aghdan0003907.50000003907.5
Getik01057.62491.271573.960000003122.85
Gilan000187.180087.7211.2401.17287.31
Goravan Sands0000000213.400213.4
Goris0001900.320000001900.32
Hankavan Hydrological000975.77000000975.77
Hazel-Nut0000041.55000041.55
Herher Open Woodland000177.97938.570388.05592.42002097.01
Ijevan0006581.1801206.100007787.28
Jermuk00164.71896.61932.97069.290004063.56
Jermuk Hydrological0351.27136.52092.380000002580.15
Juniper Open Woodlands of Sevan000298.17861.8302767.20003927.2
Khor Virap0000000159.2500159.25
Margahovit02440.8502160.310000004601.16
Pine of Banx04.62000000004.62
Pine of Gyulagarak02.6202442.310000002444.93
Plane Grove0002160.460000012.972173.43
Sev Lich0.07240.100000000240.17
Yeghegis0001527.23619.04037.7511.1002195.12
Zangezur15340.857825.7301148.02045.62000336.5724696.79
Zikatar0003195.940000003195.94

Overall, vegetation zones are unevenly represented in the PAs. The forest zone occupies the largest area within the PAs—about 1,400 km². Other zones are much smaller, ranging from 500 km² of subalpine zone to 46 km² of marshes (Figure 26B-4 a). The shares of the zones’ areas preserved in the PAs are also highly unequal. 26% and 32% of the forest and juniper zones are preserved in the PAs while for the semi-desert, steppe, and open woodland zones this share is less than 10% (Figure 26B-4 b). The desert zone is not indicative in this analysis, as it is represented by only one small unique site).

Between the total area of a vegetation zone and the share of its area preserved in the PAs, a weak, non-significant tendency towards a negative relationship between the total zonearea of a vegetation zone and its representation in the PAs: the larger the total area of a zone, the lower its representation in the PAs (Figure 26B-5). Even from this weak trend it is possible to distinguish zones that are better represented in the PAs, lying above the trend line (juniper, forest), and underrepresented zones, lying below the trend line (semi-desert, broadleaf woodland).


Changes in the area of land cover classes from 2017 to 2023

According to ESRI, between 2017 and 2023 the most notable changes occurred in Arpi Lake National Park, where the area of croplands increased by more than half, and in the Erebuni Reserve, where it decreased by one third. In the Arevik Reserve, the forest area decreased by 18% (Figure 26C-1).


Figure 26C-1. Changes in the area of land cover classes within PAs

2.6.D. Distance from natural monuments to anthropogenic areas and roads

As an example of assessing anthropogenic threats to ‘point’ ecosystems and natural objects of very small area, distances were measured between the natural monuments shown on the PA map provided by Acopian Center for the Environment, American University of Armenia, and anthropogenic areas (built-up areas and croplands according to the ESRI 2023 land cover), roads (including main roads and all other roads including trails from the dataset of Forest Atlas of Armenia), and population polygons with more than 100 residents (based on the Kontur Population Dataset).

This example shows, that even minor errors in land cover classification—amounting to just a few pixels—can significantly distort the calculated distances to natural monuments. Therefore, to obtain reliable results, it is essential to use land cover data specifically refined for Armenia.


Figure 26D-1. The map of natural monuments used (in details see here Section Protected Areas)


Figure 26D-2. An Example of distances for Dasak Biological Monument in Armavir marz


Figure 26D-3. Distance from different categories of natural monuments to various types of anthropogenic areas and roads, in meters.
Pop-100 – hexagons with a population of more than 100 people.

Unfortunately, at this stage the lack of an officially approved digital map of PA boundaries, combined with errors in the ESRI land-cover data, prevents accurate accounting of ecosystem extent within PAs. For PAs with small areas, even minor land-cover errors can significantly distort the actual proportions of different ecosystem types. Moreover, the misclassification of anthropogenic areas where none exist leads to inaccurate assessments of threats to natural ecosystems and natural monuments. For instance, the misclassification of cropland and built-up areas in the high-mountain zone of the Gegham Ridge in the land-cover data artificially reduced the estimated distance between natural monuments and anthropogenic territories.

Figure 26D-4. Erroneous underestimation of the distance between anthropogenic areas and hydrographic monuments due to ESRI land cover mistakenly detecting croplands and built-up areas on the Gegham Ridge.

hy